Alfaro v. Vital Records

Filing 3

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/10/12 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED, and that plaintiff be given thirty days in which to pay the filing fee of $350.00. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations.(Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MIKAELLA CRISTINA ALFARO,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13

vs.
VITAL RECORDS,
Defendant.

14

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
/

15
16

No. 2:12-cv-2293-JAM-EFB PS

Plaintiff, proceeding in pro se, has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant

17

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.1 Dckt. No. 2. Plaintiff has submitted an affidavit in support of her

18

application to proceed in forma pauperis, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Id.

19

Pursuant to federal statute, a filing fee of $350.00 is required to commence a civil action

20

in federal district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The court may authorize the commencement of an

21

action without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor, by a person who submits an

22

affidavit showing that he is unable to pay such costs or give security therefor. 28 U.S.C.

23

§ 1915(a)(1). An in forma pauperis applicant must demonstrate that because of her poverty, she

24

cannot meet court costs and still provide herself and her dependents with the necessities of life.

25
1

26

This matter was referred to the undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
1

1

Martinez v. Kristi Kleaners, Inc., 364 F.3d 1305, 1307 (11th Cir. 2004) (affidavit is sufficient if

2

it represents that the litigant is “unable to pay for the court fees and costs, and to provide

3

necessities for himself and his dependents”) (citing Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.,

4

335 U.S. 331, 339-40 (1948); see also, Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate,

5

Inc., 865 F.2d 22, 23 (2d Cir. 1988) (denying in forma pauperis status where applicant had a net

6

income of approximately $20,000).

7

Plaintiff’s affidavit indicates that her gross wages are $8500.00 per month and her take-

8

home wages are $8500.00 per month. Dckt. No. 2. The affidavit also indicates that she receives

9

$1107.00 in disability and $4568.00 in gifts or inheritance, and that she has $292,000.00 in a

10

checking or savings account. Id. Based on those averments, the court finds that plaintiff has

11

failed to demonstrate that she has insufficient assets to pay the filing fee and costs and provide

12

the necessities of life for herself.

13

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s application to proceed

14

in forma pauperis be DENIED, and that plaintiff be given thirty days in which to pay the filing

15

fee of $350.00.

16

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

17

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

18

(14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

19

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

20

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are

21

advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the

22

District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst,

23

951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).

24

DATED: September 10, 2012.

25
26
2