Henderson v. Lankford et al
Filing
11
ORDER denying 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/18/12. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JEFFREY HENDERSON,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
No. 2:12-cv-2317 KJN P
vs.
R. LANKFORD, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in an action brought under 42 U.S.C.
17
§ 1983. Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require
18
counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist.
19
Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an
20
attorney to voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v.
21
Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36
22
(9th Cir. 1990). When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must
23
consider plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to
24
articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v.
25
Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (district court did not abuse discretion in declining to
26
appoint counsel). The burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances is on the plaintiff. Id.
1
1
Circumstances common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and limited law library
2
access, do not establish exceptional circumstances that warrant a request for voluntary assistance
3
of counsel.
Having considered the factors under Palmer, the court finds that plaintiff has
4
5
failed to meet his burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances warranting the
6
appointment of counsel at this time.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s September 10, 2012
7
8
request for the appointment of counsel (dkt. no. 3) is denied.
9
DATED: October 18, 2012
10
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
hend2317.31
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?