Henderson v. Lankford et al

Filing 35

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/31/14: Plaintiff's filing 34 is disregarded. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JEFFREY HENDERSON,

12
13
14

No. 2:12-cv-2317 KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

DR. R. LANKFORD, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. All parties consented to proceed

18

before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On March 10, 2014, plaintiff

19

filed a document styled, “Plaintiff Opposes and Objects to Inspection and/or Copying of his

20

Medical Records by Defendants.” (ECF No. 34.) However, any request that this court issue an

21

order must be made by formal motion, which must comply with the Local Rules of this court.

22

See Local Rule 230(l); Discovery and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 33). Accordingly, plaintiff's

23

filing (ECF No. 34) is disregarded.

24

Dated: March 31, 2014

25
26

/hend2317.34

27
28
1