Smart Modular Technologies, Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.

Filing 103

ORDER SEALING DOCKET NUMBER 90 signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/6/12. Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Netlist, Inc.'s Supplemental Request to Seal is GRANTED, and that the following materials shall be sealed pending further order of this court: Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Netlist, Inc.'s Objections to Evidence Offered in Support of Plaintiff Smart Modular's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 90 . (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM (Bar No. 174931)
[e-mail]
EDWARD H. SIKORSKI (Bar No. 208576)
[e-mail]
ERIN P. GIBSON (Bar No. 229305)
[e-mail]
RYAN W. COBB (Bar No. 277608)
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101-4297
Telephone:
619.699.2700
Facsimile:
619.699.2701
RAJIV DHARNIDHARKA (Bar No. 234756)
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2400
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
650-833-2001
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff
NETLIST, INC.

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16

SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.,

ORDER SEALING DOCKET NUMBER 90
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant,

17
18
19

Case No. 2:12-CV-02319-MCE-EFB

Judge:

Hon. Morrison C. England

v.
NETLIST, INC.

20

Defendant and
Counterclaim Plaintiff.

21
22

This Court has considered Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Netlist, Inc.’s

23
24

Supplemental Request to Seal Documents Related to Netlist, Inc.’s Opposition to Smart Modular

25

Technologies, Inc.’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction related to Docket Number 90, which

26

Netlist mistakenly filed in the public record. The Court has also considered Plaintiff and

27

Counterclaim Defendant Smart Modular Technologies, Inc.’s response.

28

///

1

The Court finds that Smart Modular Technologies, Inc. has sustained its burden of showing good

2

cause establishing that Docket Number 90 is sealable.

3

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant and Counterclaim

4

Plaintiff Netlist, Inc.’s Supplemental Request to Seal is GRANTED, and that the following

5

materials shall be sealed pending further order of this court:

6
7

1.

Offered in Support of Plaintiff Smart Modular’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 90).

8
9

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Netlist, Inc.’s Objections to Evidence

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 6, 2012

10

__________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
d6b0d3

DEAC_Signature-E

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-