McCulloch v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/9/14 SETTLING Attorney's fees re 30 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS ($4,000.00). (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Regional Chief Counsel Social Security Administration THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS, CSBN 189450 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel 160 Spear St Ste 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8938 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: theophous.reagans@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 ADELE MARIE MCCULLOCH, 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 20 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 12-CV-02329-EFB STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER SETTLING ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 22 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned 24 counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the 25 Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND 26 DOLLARS ($4,000.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on 27 behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 28 § 2412(d). -1- 1 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees, expenses and costs to Plaintiff, The 2 government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and expenses and 3 costs to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the ability to 4 honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees, expenses and costs are subject to any 5 offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the 6 order for EAJA fees, expenses and costs is entered, the government will determine whether they 7 are subject to any offset. 8 Fees, expenses and costs shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the 9 Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause 10 the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Bess Brewer, pursuant to the 11 assignment executed by Plaintiff, if there is an assignment. Any payments made shall be 12 delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. 13 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA 14 attorney fees, expenses and costs, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of 15 Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release 16 from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to 17 EAJA attorney fees and expenses and costs in connection with this action. 18 19 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the provisions of the EAJA. 20 Respectfully submitted, 21 22 Dated: October 8, 2014 23 24 25 ///// 26 /s/Bess Brewer BESS BREWER Attorney for Plaintiff [as authorized by telephone] ///// 27 ///// 28 -2- 5 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration /s/ Theophous H. Reagans THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 6 Attorneys for Defendant 1 Dated: October 8, 2014 2 3 By: 4 7 ORDER 8 9 10 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. DATED: October 9, 2014. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?