Alfaro v. California Place Apts.

Filing 4

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/24/13 Recommending that this Acion be dismissed with prejudice re 1 . These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to these F&R due within fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MIKAELLA CHRISTINA ALFARO,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. 2:12-cv-2337 JAM GGH PS

vs.
CALIFORNIA PLACE APTS., et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/

16

By order filed December 17, 2012, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and

17

twenty-eight days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court

18

informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in her complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now

19

expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s

20

order.

21

Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the

22

reasons given in the December 17, 2012, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this

23

action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

25

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

26

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written
1

1

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

3

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

4

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

5

DATED: January 24, 2013

6
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9

GGH:076/Alfaro2337.fta.wpd

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2