Cofield v. Swarthout et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/25/2014 ADOPTING 35 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 30 Motion to Dismiss. (Donati, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

VINCENT E. COFIELD,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:12-cv-2343-MCE-EFB P

v.

ORDER

G. SWARTHOUT, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On May 13, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

20
21

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 13, 2014, are adopted in full; and

27
28

/////
1

1
2

2. Defendant Valencia’s February 21, 2014 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30) is denied.
Dated: June 25, 2014

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2