California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection v. MWE Services, Inc., et al
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/3/12 REMANDING CASE to Yuba County Superior Court. Certified copy of remand order sent to other court. The Court also ORDERS Mr. Martin to WITHDRAW his 9 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice to re-filing it after remand and VACATES the motion hearing date currently set for 11/7/12 at 9:30 a.m. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
SARA J. RUSSELL, State Bar No. 84704
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
STEPHEN M. LERNER, State Bar No. 176688
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 445-5442
Fax: (916) 327-2319
E-mail: Stephen.Lerner@doj.ca.gov
7
8
Attorneys for
Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
9
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION,
2:12CV02348-JAM-CDK
14
ORDER OF REMAND
Plaintiff,
15
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
Trial Date:
Action Filed:
v.
16
17
MWE SERVICES, INC. dba MIDWEST
DEMOLITION COMPANY, et al,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
The Court orders the above-entitled action remanded to the Yuba County Superior Court
22
and instructs the clerk of the court to mail a certified copy of this order to the clerk of the Yuba
23
County Superior Court.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
[Proposed] Order of Remand (2:12 cv-02348-JAM-CDK)
1
The Court also orders Mr. Martin to withdraw his motion to dismiss without prejudice to re-
2
filing it after remand and vacates the motion hearing date currently set for November 7, 2012 at
3
9:30 a.m.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
10/3/2012
/s/ John A. Mendez_____________
Judge, United States District Court
6
7
8
9
SA2012106337
31536343.doc
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[Proposed] Order of Remand (2:12 cv-02348-JAM-CDK)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?