Gutierrez et al v. Breck et al

Filing 38

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/22/13 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice, with each side to bear their own attorney's fees and costs, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Nancy J. Sheehan, SBN 109419 350 University Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 Attorneys for Defendants ZIGGY ROBESON, CHRISTOPHER BRECK, CHUE LOR, TARAS CHERNYY, ANTHONY RUIZ and EMILY KELLY 7 MASTAGNI, HOLSTEDT, AMICK, MILLER & JOHNSON 8 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION David P. Mastagni, SBN 57721 9 Judith Odbert, SBN 13126 10 William Briggs, SBN 46236 1912 I Street 11 Sacramento, CA 95811 Telephone: (916) 446-4692 12 Facsimile: (916) 447-4614 Attorneys for Defendant BRANCHE SMITH 13 14 LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ STEWART KATZ, SBN 127425 15 555 University Avenue, Suite 270 Sacramento, California 95825 16 Telephone: (916) 444-5678 Facsimile: (916) 444-3364 17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18 ANDRES GUTIERREZ, ANDREW LATSHAW, DEMONTE KELLY, JOVON KELLY, AUSTIN WESTALL, and WENDY SEGARRA 19 ANWYL, SCOFFIELD & STEPP, LLP 20 James T. Anwyl, SBN 78715 Lynn A. Garcia, SBN 131196 21 Post Office Box 269127 22 Sacramento, CA 95826-9127 Telephone: (916) 565-1800 23 Attorneys for Defendants ZIGGY ROBESON, CHRISTOPHER BRECK, CHUE LOR, TARAS CHERNYY, ANTHONY 24 RUIZ, EMILY KELLY, and FRANK PORTER 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// {01095109.DOCX} 1 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 ANDRES GUTIERREZ, et al., 4 Plaintiffs, 5 6 7 NO. 2:12-CV-02358-JAM/CKD STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER v. Former Twin Rivers Police Department Chief CHRISTOPHER BRECK; et al., 8 Defendants. Complaint filed: September 13, 2012 9 10 11 IT IS NOW HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, that this action be dismissed, with 12 prejudice, with each side to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of 13 14 15 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: January 18, 2013 PORTER SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 16 17 By /s/ Nancy J. Sheehan Nancy J. Sheehan Attorney for Defendants ZIGGY ROBESON, CHRISTOPHER BRECK, CHUE LOR, TARAS CHERNYY, ANTHONY RUIZ and EMILY KELLY 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: January 18, 2013 23 ANWYL, SCOFFIELD & STEPP, LLP By /s/ James T. Anwyl (authorized on 1-18-13) James T. Anwyl Lynn A. Garcia Attorney for Defendants ZIGGY ROBESON, CHRISTOPHER BRECK, CHUE LOR, TARAS CHERNYY, ANTHONY RUIZ EMILY KELLY, and FRANK PORTER 24 25 26 27 28 {01095109.DOCX} 2 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Dated: January 18, 2013 MASTAGNI, HOLSTEDT, AMICK, MILLER & JOHNSEN, APC 2 3 By ___/s/ William M. Briggs (authorized on 1-18-13)_ William M. Briggs Attorneys for Defendant BRANCHE SMITH 4 5 6 7 Dated: January 18, 2013 LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ 8 9 By /s/ Stewart Katz (authorized on 1-15-13) Stewart Katz Attorney for Plaintiffs 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: 1/22/2013 14 15 /s/ John A. Mendez_________________________ THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {01095109.DOCX} 3 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?