Manning, et al., v. CDCR, et al.,

Filing 113

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/25/2014 ADOPTING 91 Findings and Recommendations in full and GRANTING-IN-PART and DENYING-IN-PART 85 Motion to Dismiss. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHERMAN MANNING, 12 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-2440 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. BUNNELL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner who has been proceeding with counsel, has filed this civil rights 18 action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 2, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 2, 2014, are adopted in full; 28 2. The motion to dismiss brought by defendants Schroeder, Stratton and O’Brien (ECF 1 1 No. 85) is granted in part and denied in part as follows: 2 a. Granted as to defendants Schroeder and O’Brien; 3 b. Granted as to Claim 1 against Defendant Stratton; and 4 c. Denied as to Claim 2 against defendant Stratton. 5 Dated: June 25, 2014 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?