Manning, et al., v. CDCR, et al.,

Filing 221

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/11/15 ordering the Office of the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General Kelli Hammond shall forthwith take any steps necessary to contact prison authorities and staff at California Substanc e Abuse Treatment Facility to ascertain plaintiff's condition in light oh his apparent suicide threat, within 7 days, file a status report with the court. The clerk of the court is directed to fax a copy of this order to the Litigation Coordina tor at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility. The office of the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General Kelli Hammond are further directed to investigate and report to the court regarding plaintiff's allegations that correctional o fficers have physically and sexually assaulted him 213 , 214 , 218 and deliberately delayed, destroyed, or stolen his legal property 211 , 212 , 213 within 14 days of the filing of this order. Defendant Stratton is directed to provide a response to plaintiff's allegations, as identified above, within 14 days of the filing of this order. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHERMAN D. MANNING, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-02440 MCE AC P v. ORDER M. BUNNELL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se on a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 17 18 § 1983. In a letter filed on March 6, 2015, plaintiff indicates that he “feel[s] like committing 19 suicide” and is “extremely close to giving up.” ECF No. 219.1 Although his statements are 20 rambling and may be histrionic, the court cannot ignore such statements. Plaintiff has also filed several letters in which he alleges that correctional officers have 21 22 physically and sexually assaulted him (ECF Nos. 213, 214, 218) and deliberately withheld, 23 destroyed, or stolen his legal property (ECF Nos. 211-213) to encourage him to drop this lawsuit. 24 The court will direct the Attorney General’s Office to investigate these allegations and report to 25 the court on its findings. 26 //// 27 28 1 Entered in case docket on March 9, 2015. 1 1 Plaintiff additionally alleges that defendant Stratton, specifically, is harassing him. ECF 2 Nos. 195, 196, 198, 200, 211. Plaintiff alleges that Stratton has (1) forced him to stop taking his 3 medications for his valley fever (ECF Nos. 195, 198); (2) threatened to have him assaulted by 4 other inmates (ECF No. 196, 200); (3) is interfering with his non-legal mail (ECF No. 200); and 5 (4) orchestrated his transfer to administrative segregation (ECF No. 211). The court will require a 6 response from defendant Stratton regarding plaintiff’s allegations against him. 7 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 8 1. The Office of the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General Kelli Hammond 9 shall forthwith take any steps necessary to contact prison authorities and staff at California 10 Substance Abuse Treatment Facility to ascertain plaintiff’s condition in light of his apparent 11 suicide threat and, within seven (7) days, file a status report with the court. 12 13 14 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to fax a copy of this order to the Litigation Coordinator at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility. 3. The Office of the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General Kelli Hammond are 15 further directed to investigate and report to the court regarding plaintiff’s allegations that 16 correctional officers have physically and sexually assaulted him (ECF Nos. 213, 214, 218) and 17 deliberately delayed, destroyed, or stolen his legal property (ECF Nos. 211-213) within fourteen 18 days of the filing of this order. 19 4. Defendant Stratton is directed to provide a response to plaintiff’s allegations, as 20 identified above, within fourteen days of the filing of this order. 21 DATED: March 11, 2015 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?