Manning, et al., v. CDCR, et al.,
Filing
285
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/28/2015 ORDERING that the 252 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Plaintiff's 195 , 196 , 198 , 200 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 218 , 226 , 227 requests for preliminary injunctive relief are DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SHERMAN D. MANNING,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:12-cv-2440 MCE AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
M. BUNNELL, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On May 15, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 252. Plaintiff
23
has filed several documents that are not identified as objections to the findings and
24
recommendations, but that could be considered objections to the findings and recommendations.
25
See ECF Nos. 256, 260, 261, 263, 268.
26
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
27
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
28
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
analysis.
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 15, 2015 (ECF No. 252), are ADOPTED
in full; and
2. Plaintiff’s requests for preliminary injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 195, 196, 198, 200, 211,
212, 213, 214, 218, 226, 227) are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 28, 2015
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?