Coyle v. Cates et al

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/18/2013 VACATING the 17 findings and recommendations; and in due course, the court will screen the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SEAN NICHOLAS COYLE,
Plaintiff,

10
11
12
13

vs.
MATTHEW CATES, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
/

14
15

No. 2:12-cv-2446 JAM EFB P

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

16

U.S.C. § 1983. On March 25, 2013, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to

17

amend. On June 7, 2013, the undersigned found that plaintiff had not filed an amended

18

complaint as ordered, and recommended that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

19

However, the docket reflects that plaintiff filed an amended complaint on June 5, 2013.

20

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

21

1. The June 7, 2013 findings and recommendations (Dckt. No. 17) are vacated; and

22

2. In due course, the court will screen the amended complaint (Dckt. No. 16) pursuant to

23

28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

24

Dated: June 18, 2013.

25
26