Kalani v. Singh Randhawa, et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/1/13 ORDERING that Defendants are granted thirty (30) days to either retain counsel and have counsel file a responsive pleading or, if proceeding pro se, to each file a responsive pleading; After the passage of thirty days, if no defendant has filed a responsive pleading, plaintiff shall re-notice his motion for default judgment for hearing before the undersigned; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on each defendant at 900 S Cherokee Lane, Lodi, CA 95240. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT KALANI, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:12-cv-2453 KJM DAD vs. SUKHINDER JIT SINGH RANDHAWA, ORDER el al., 14 15 16 Defendants. / 17 This matter came before the court on March 1, 2013, for hearing of plaintiff’s 18 motion for default judgment. (Doc. No. 12.) Tanya Moore, Esq. appeared telephonically on 19 behalf of the plaintiff. Defendant Didar S. Randhawa appeared in person on his own behalf and 20 defendant Daljit S. Grover appeared in person on his own behalf. 21 22 23 24 Upon consideration of the arguments on file and made at the hearing, and for the reasons set forth in detail on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants are granted thirty (30) days to either retain counsel and have counsel file a responsive pleading or, if proceeding pro se, to each file a responsive pleading; 25 2. After the passage of thirty days, if no defendant has filed a responsive 26 pleading, plaintiff shall re-notice his motion for default judgment for hearing before the 1 1 2 undersigned; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on each 3 defendant at 900 S Cherokee Lane, Lodi, CA 95240. 4 DATED: March 1, 2013. 5 6 7 8 9 10 DAD:6 Ddad1\orders.civil\kalani2453.oah.030113 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?