Kalani v. Singh Randhawa, et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/1/13 ORDERING that Defendants are granted thirty (30) days to either retain counsel and have counsel file a responsive pleading or, if proceeding pro se, to each file a responsive pleading; After the passage of thirty days, if no defendant has filed a responsive pleading, plaintiff shall re-notice his motion for default judgment for hearing before the undersigned; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on each defendant at 900 S Cherokee Lane, Lodi, CA 95240. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ROBERT KALANI,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:12-cv-2453 KJM DAD
vs.
SUKHINDER JIT SINGH RANDHAWA, ORDER
el al.,
14
15
16
Defendants.
/
17
This matter came before the court on March 1, 2013, for hearing of plaintiff’s
18
motion for default judgment. (Doc. No. 12.) Tanya Moore, Esq. appeared telephonically on
19
behalf of the plaintiff. Defendant Didar S. Randhawa appeared in person on his own behalf and
20
defendant Daljit S. Grover appeared in person on his own behalf.
21
22
23
24
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and made at the hearing, and for the
reasons set forth in detail on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendants are granted thirty (30) days to either retain counsel and have
counsel file a responsive pleading or, if proceeding pro se, to each file a responsive pleading;
25
2. After the passage of thirty days, if no defendant has filed a responsive
26
pleading, plaintiff shall re-notice his motion for default judgment for hearing before the
1
1
2
undersigned; and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on each
3
defendant at 900 S Cherokee Lane, Lodi, CA 95240.
4
DATED: March 1, 2013.
5
6
7
8
9
10
DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.civil\kalani2453.oah.030113
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?