Schneider et al v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 104

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/18/2015 ORDERING that the parties shall compile a Statement of Undisputed Facts to be filed with the court no later than 9/18/2015, with no dispositive motions to be filed before this date. Dispositive m otions shall be filed no later than 10/16/2015. Oppositions shall be filed no later than 12/4/2015. Replies shall be filed no later than 12/30/2015. The court anticipates a combined hearing in January 2016. Defendants O'Bryant, Norris, Testa, an d Taras may file a consolidated motion for summary judgment supported by a memorandum of point and authorities of up to sixty-five pages; the consolidated brief in opposition may likewise not exceed sixty-five pages, and the consolidated reply shall not exceed thirty-two pages. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

JOSEPH HARDESTY and YVETTE
HARDESTY,
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15
16

No. 2:10-cv-2414-KJM-KJN

v.
SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR
QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT,
et al.,
Defendants.

17
18
19

JAY SCHNEIDER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

20
21
22
23

No. 2:12-cv-2457-KJM-KJN
ORDER

v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,
Defendants.

24
25

The plaintiffs and defendants in Case No. 10-2414, the Hardesty case, and Case

26

No. 12-2457, the Schneider case, have each filed a joint status report and request to modify the

27

scheduling order. See Defs.’ Rep., ECF No. 213; Pls.’ Rep., ECF No. 214. They request an order

28

setting a schedule for the filing of a joint statement of undisputed facts and dispositive motions.
1

1

Defendant David Bieber, the sole remaining defendant in Schneider et al. v. County of

2

Sacramento, et al., No. 12-2457, requests exemption from any consolidated briefing schedule, a

3

request the court DENIES.

4

Having considered the parties’ reports, the court orders as follows:

5

(1) The parties shall compile a Statement of Undisputed Facts to be filed with the

6

court no later than September 18, 2015, with no dispositive motions to be filed before this date;

7

(2) Dispositive motions shall be filed no later than October 16, 2015;

8

(3) Oppositions shall be filed no later than December 4, 2015;

9

(4) Replies shall be filed no later than December 30, 2015;

10

(5) The court anticipates a combined hearing in January 2016; and

11

(6) Defendants O’Bryant, Norris, Testa, and Taras may file a consolidated motion

12

for summary judgment supported by a memorandum of point and authorities of up to sixty-five

13

pages; the consolidated brief in opposition may likewise not exceed sixty-five pages, and the

14

consolidated reply shall not exceed thirty-two pages.

15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16

DATED: August 18, 2015.

17
18
19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2