Taylor v. 144th Fighter Wing, et .al.
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/15/2013 continuing the Scheduling Conference to 7/8/2013 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Pursuant to Local Rule 240, theparties shall submit to the court a Joint Status Report fourteen(14) calendar days prior to the hearing date. (Kirksey Smith, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
----oo0oo---11
12
NO. CIV. 2:12-2466 WBS DAD
GARY TAYLOR,
13
Plaintiff,
ORDER
14
15
16
17
18
v.
144TH FIGHTER WING, CALIFORNIA
AIR NATIONAL GUARD, CALIFORNIA
NATIONAL GUARD, DEFENSE FINANCE
AND ACCOUNTING SERVICES (DFAS),
HARRY M. WYATT III, DAVID S.
BALDWIN, SAMI D. SAID, MARK
GROVES, TERESA MCKAY, and DOES
ONE THROUGH TEN,
19
Defendants.
/
20
21
----oo0oo---
22
23
In their Joint Status Report, the parties indicated
24
that none of the individual defendants--Wyatt, Baldwin, Said,
25
Groves, and McKay--in the above-cited case have been served.
26
(Docket No. 28.)
27
28
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides:
If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the
complaint is filed, the court--on motion or on its own
after notice to the plaintiff--must dismiss the action
1
1
2
3
without prejudice against that defendant or order that
service be made within a specified time. But if the
plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court
must extend the time for service for an appropriate
period.
4
The 120-day limit imposed by Rule 4(m) expires 120 days
5
after the first complaint in which the defendant is named.
6
Rudolph v. UT Starcom, Inc., Civ. No. 07-04578 SI, 2009 WL
7
248370, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2009) (citing Bolden v. City of
8
Topeka, 441 F.3d 1129, 1148 (10th Cir. 2006)); City of Merced v.
9
Fields, 997 F. Supp. 1326, 1337-39 (E.D. Cal. 1998) (Coyle, J.).
10
The individual defendants were named for the first time in this
11
action in the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed on January
12
29, 2013.
(Docket No. 21.)
Plaintiffs must therefore complete
13
service of process on those parties within 120 days after the FAC
14
was filed.
15
The parties stipulate that the United States waives
16
process service of the summons and complaint under Federal Rule
17
of Civil Procedure 4(i) upon the United States Attorney, the
18
United States Attorney General, and DFAS.
The parties further
19
stipulate that the time for response to the FAC by the United
20
States, DFAS, and the first two individual defendants to be
21
served with the summons and complaint under Rule 4, be extended
22
until sixty days after the date of service of the summons and
23
complaint upon the third individual defendant to be served with
24
process.
25
Finally, because the parties have requested that
26
initial disclosures, discovery scheduling, and pretrial motion
27
scheduling be deferred until all individual defendants are
28
2
1
served, the scheduling conference in this matter is hereby
2
continued until July 8, 2013.
3
parties shall submit to the court a Joint Status Report fourteen
4
(14) calendar days prior to the hearing date.
5
6
Pursuant to Local Rule 240, the
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 15, 2013
7
8
9
_________________________________________
WILLIAM B. SHUBB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?