Trofimuk v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/19/2012 ORDERING that Plaintiffs 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve scheduling order in Social Security cases. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. Within fourteen days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal an original and five copies of the completed summons, five c opies of the complaint, five copies of the scheduling order and a completed USM-285 form, and shall file a statement with the court that such documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than sixty days from the date of this order. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
IVAN TROFIMUK,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. 2:12-cv-02482 KJN
v.
MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of
Social Security,
14
Defendant.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed without the prepayment of fees and costs,
17
also referred to as in forma pauperis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.1 Plaintiff has submitted the
18
required affidavit, which demonstrates that plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give
19
security for them. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. See
20
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
21
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
1.
Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 2) is granted.
23
2.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned’s scheduling
24
order in Social Security cases.
25
1
26
This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local
Rule 302(c)(15) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
1
1
2
3.
The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on
the United States Marshal.
3
4.
Within fourteen days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to
4
the United States Marshal an original and five copies of the completed summons, five copies of
5
the complaint, five copies of the scheduling order and a completed USM-285 form, and shall file
6
a statement with the court that such documents have been submitted to the United States
7
Marshal.
8
9
5.
The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without
prepayment of costs not later than sixty days from the date of this order. Service of process shall
10
be completed by delivering a copy of the summons, complaint, and scheduling order to the
11
United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, and by sending two copies of the
12
summons, complaint, and scheduling order by registered or certified mail to the Attorney General
13
of the United States at Washington, D.C. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(A) & (B). The Marshal
14
shall also send a copy of the summons, complaint, and scheduling order by registered or certified
15
mail to the Commissioner of Social Security, c/o Office of the General Counsel, Region IX, 160
16
Spear Street, Suite 800, San Francisco, CA 94105-1545. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(2); 20 C.F.R.
17
423.1(a). The United States Marshal shall thereafter file a statement with the court that such
18
documents have been served.
19
6.
Plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel are advised of Local Rule 110, which
20
provides: “Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with [the court’s Local] Rules or with any
21
order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions
22
authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”
23
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 19, 2012
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?