Bell et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Filing 149

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/8/2017 ORDERING that the hearing on defendant's #146 motion to dismiss is CONTINUED to 6/20/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
5 DONNA M. MEZIAS (SBN 111902) LIZ K. BERTKO (SBN 268128) AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 580 California Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-765-9500 Facsimile: 415-765-9501 dmezias@akingump.com lbertko@akingump.com 6 Attorneys for defendant 1 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 SANDY BELL and MARTIN GAMA, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, and as aggrieved employees pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”), Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 Case No. 2:12-cv-02499-JAM-CKD [Assigned for All Purposes to Hon. John A. Mendez] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., a Delaware corporation; JOHN BROOKS, an individual; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 MICHAEL HENRY, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and the general public, Plaintiff, 22 23 24 25 26 v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 150, inclusive, Defendants. 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 230(f), defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and 3 plaintiffs Sandy Bell, Martin Gama, and Michael Henry (“Plaintiffs”), hereby enter into 4 this stipulation based on the following facts and circumstances: 5 1. On May 2, 2017, defendant filed its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 6 on Plaintiffs’ Claims for Penalties under Sections 203 and 226 (DE 146) and properly 7 noticed the motion to be heard on June 6, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. before the Honorable John 8 A. Mendez. 9 10 11 2. On May 3, 2017, counsel for plaintiff Michael Henry advised the parties that he has a scheduling conflict and is unavailable for the noticed June 6 hearing date. 3. Defendant’s counsel contacted the Court and was advised that the next 12 available date that the Court is able to hear defendant’s motion is June 20, 2017, at 1:30 13 p.m. Defendant’s counsel has conferred with counsel for Plaintiffs and all have 14 confirmed their availability for a hearing on June 20. 15 4. Plaintiffs are currently reviewing the motion and reserve the right to 16 request additional time to conduct discovery and oppose the motion, or file a declaration 17 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 56(d); 18 5. NOW, THEREFORE, Defendant and Plaintiffs hereby stipulate and agree 19 that the June 6, 2017 hearing date for defendant’s motion be continued to June 20, 2017, 20 at 1:30 p.m. 21 22 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 23 24 Dated: May 5, 2017 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD, LLP 25 26 27 28 By /s/ Donna M. Mezias Donna M. Mezias Attorneys for defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE 1 Dated: May 5, 2017 CAPSTONE LAW APC 2 3 By /s/ Arnab Banerjee Arnab Banerjee Attorneys for plaintiffs SANDY BELL and MARTIN GAMA 4 5 6 Dated: May 5, 2017 SETAREH LAW GROUP 7 8 9 10 By /s/ Shaun Setareh Shaun Setareh Attorneys for plaintiff MICHAEL HENRY 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE 1 2 3 GOOD CAUSE SHOWING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 146) is continued from June 6, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. to June 20, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. 4 5 Dated: May 8, 2017 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?