Esquivel et al v Bank of America, N.A., et al

Filing 79

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/25/15 ORDERING the Stipulated 78 Request is GRANTED; Plaintiffs to file Notice and submit Stipulated Request to Seal Documents in Support of Motion for Class Certification-7/3/15; Plaintiffs to file Motion for Class Certification in the same form as originally submitted-Within three court days of issuance of Order on sealing request; Defendant to file Notice and submit Stipulated Request to Seal Documents in Support of Cl ass Certification Opposition-7/31/15; Defendant to file Opposition to Motion for Class Certification in the same form as originally submitted-Within three court days of issuance of Order on sealing request; Plaintiffs to file Notice and submit St ipulated Request to Seal Documents in Support of Class Certification Reply-9/4/15; Plaintiffs to file Reply in support of Motion for Class Certification-Within three days of issuance of Order on sealing request; Class Certification Hearing-9/28/15; Also, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is rescheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m., on 12/7/15. A joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DANIEL J. MULLIGAN, SBN 103129 JENKINS MULLIGAN & GABRIEL LLP 10085 Carroll Canyon Road, Ste. 210 San Diego, CA 92131 Telephone: (415) 982-8500 Facsimile: (415) 982-8515 Email: dan@jmglawoffices.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs ANTONIO AND BEATRIZ ESQUIVEL; and the putative class. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 12 13 ANTONIO ESQUIVEL AND BEATRIZ ESQUIVEL, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 18 v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A; BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; and DOES 1 through 100 inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 12-CV-02502-GEB-KJN ORDER ON STIPULATED REQUEST FOR NEW BRIEFING AND HEARING DATES ON PLANITIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER Date: Time: Judge: Dept.: No Date Set No Time Set Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Courtroom 10, 13th Floor 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER ON STIPULATED REQUEST FOR NEW HEARING DATE AND MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NO. 12-CV-02502 ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 Having examined the parties’ Stipulated Request for New Hearing Date and Modification of Scheduling Order, (ECF No. 78), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulated Request is GRANTED, as modified, as follows: 6 7 8 9 10 11 Deadline Date Plaintiffs to file Notice and submit Stipulated Request to Seal July 3, 2015 Documents in Support of Motion for Class Certification. Plaintiffs to file Motion for Class Certification in the same Within three court days of form as originally submitted. issuance of Order on sealing request. Defendant to file Notice and submit Stipulated Request to Seal Documents in Support of Class Certification Opposition. July 31, 2015 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Defendant to file Opposition to Motion for Class Certification Within three court days of in the same form as originally submitted. issuance of Order on sealing request. Plaintiffs to file Notice and submit Stipulated Request to Seal September 4, 2015 Documents in Support of Class Certification Reply. Plaintiffs to file Reply in support of Motion for Class Within three days of issuance Certification. of Order on sealing request. Class Certification Hearing. September 28, 2015 19 20 21 Also, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is rescheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on December 7, 2015. A joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to 22 23 24 25 the status conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 25, 2015 26 27 28 2 ORDER ON STIPULATED REQUEST FOR NEW HEARING DATE AND MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NO. 12-CV-02502

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?