Alfaro v. Johnson
Filing
5
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/21/12 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MIKAELLA CRISTINA ALFARO,
11
Plaintiff,
No. CIV 2:12-cv-2543-JAM-AC (PS)
12
vs.
13
FRED JOHNSON,
14
Defendant.
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
15
/
16
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. On October 29, 2012, plaintiff was
17
directed to pay the appropriate filing fee and to show cause why this action should not be
18
dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has not submitted the appropriate
19
filing fee and has further failed to respond to the court order.
20
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed.
21
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
22
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen
23
days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
24
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
25
“Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections
26
1
1
within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.
2
Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
3
DATED: November 21, 2012
4
5
/s/
ALLISON CLAIRE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
/mb;alfa2543.fr.dm
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?