Resource Marine Pte, Ltd. et al v. Solym Carriers (London) Limited, et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION and ORDER FOR DISMISSAL signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/28/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 CONTE C. CICALA (State Bar No. 173554) FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP 343 Sansome Street, Suite 540 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 693-5566 Telecopier: (415) 693-0410 Email: contec@fdw-law.com 5 6 7 8 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff 11 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 343 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 540 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 (415) 693-5566 FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP 9 GEORGE M. CHALOS (GC-8693) Admitted pro hac vice CHALOS & CO, P.C. 55 Hamilton Avenue Oyster Bay, NY 11771 Telephone: (516) 714-4300 Telecopier: (516) 750-9051 Email: gmc@chaloslaw.com RESOURCE MARINE PTE., LTD. 12 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 16 RESOURCE MARINE PTE., LTD. 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, vs. SOLYM CARRIERS (LONDON) LIMITED f/k/a AEGIS CARRIERS (A.C.E.) LTD., PRIMAL SHIPMANAGEMENT INC., SOLYM CARRIERS LIMITED, and SHINE NAVIGATION LTD., ) CASE NO.: 2:12-CV-2554-JAM ) ) IN ADMIRALTY ) ) ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. 23 24 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff RESOURCE MARINE PTE., LTD. (“RMPL”) 25 and Defendant SHINE NAVIGATION LTD.’s (“SHINE”) Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. #38). 26 The parties stipulate that the pending Rule B Action and claim for unpaid hire should be dismissed 27 28 with prejudice. The parties further stipulate that the substitute security posted by SHINE, plus any _______________________________________________________________________________ -1STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No.: 2:12-cv-2554-JAM 1 accrued interest, should be released consistent with the terms of the Parties’ confidential 2 agreement and that Plaintiff RMPL’s Order on motion for Writ of Attachment and Garnishment of 3 the M/V SIDER PINK (Doc. #7), should be vacated. The Court is of the opinion that the 4 stipulation should be entered, and this action dismissed. 5 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this Rule B Action and the Plaintiff’s claim for 6 7 unpaid hire is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without costs subject to the terms of the 8 Parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal. 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that RMPL’s Order on motion for Writ of Attachment and Garnishment of the M/V SIDER PINK (Doc. #7), is VACATED. The substitute security in the 11 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 343 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 540 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 (415) 693-5566 FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP 9 12 amount of USD 232,800.00, plus any accrued interest, shall be released in accordance with the 13 terms of the Parties’ confidential settlement agreement. This dismissal is without prejudice to the 14 terms of the confidential Settlement Agreement between the parties dated January 23, 2013. 15 So ORDERED and SIGNED 16 17 18 DATED: January 28, 2013 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 SUBMITTED BY: s/ George M. Chalos George M. Chalos Admitted Pro Hac Vice CHALOS & CO, P.C. 55 Hamilton Avenue, Oyster Bay, NY 11771 Telephone: (516) 714-4300 Telecopier: (516) 750-9051 Email: gmc@chaloslaw.com 28 _______________________________________________________________________________ -2STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No.: 2:12-cv-2554-JAM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 OF COUNSEL Conte C. Cicala (State Bar No. 173554) Jeanine Steele Tede (State Bar No. 177731) FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP 343 Sansome Street, Suite 540 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 693-5566 Telecopier: (415) 693-0410 Email: contec@fdw-law.com Attorneys for Plaintiff RESOURCE MARINE PTE., LTD. 10 11 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 343 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 540 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 (415) 693-5566 FLYNN, DELICH & WISE LLP 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _______________________________________________________________________________ -3STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No.: 2:12-cv-2554-JAM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?