Vasquez v. State of California et al

Filing 37

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 07/16/13 recommending that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT VASQUEZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:12-cv-2562 JAM CKD P

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

15

Defendants.

16
17

By order filed May 24, 2013, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to

18

file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has

19

not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Local

20
21

Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

22

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

23

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

24

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

25

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

26

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

2

(9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: July 16, 2013

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9

2 / vasq2562.fta

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2