Sykes v. Athannasious et al

Filing 144

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/31/16 ordering Plaintiff Milton Sykes shall file his Oppositions to Defendants Motions for Summary Judgment on or before November 30, 2016. Defendants Reply shall be due within forty-five (45) days after filing of Plaintiffs Oppositions to the Motions for Summary Judgment.(Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 Rebecca E. Ihejirika, SBN: 225823 2 Law Office of Rebecca E. Ihejirika 3 1600 Sacramento Inn Way, Suite 109 4 Sacramento, CA 95815 5 Tel.: (916) 972-8774 6 Attorney for Plaintiff - Milton Sykes 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 MILTON SYKES ) CASE NO.: 2:12-CV-02570-TLN-KJN 13 Plaintiff ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ) ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR 14 Vs. 15 ) FILING OF PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION 16 ) TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR 17 ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 18 )DEFENDANTS’ REPLY 19 ) 20 DR. ATHANNASIOUS, ET AL. ) 21 And DOES 1 THROUGH 5 ) 22 Defendants ) JUDGE: THE HONORABLE KENDALL J. 23 24 25 ) NEWMAN On June 28, 2016, based on the parties’ stipulation, the court entered an order extending 26 the time for filing of Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and 27 Defendants’ reply. 28 On May 20, 2016, the court appointed Rebecca A. Weinstein-Hamilton as co-counsel to 29 represent Plaintiff for the limited purpose of opposing Defendants’ motions for summary 30 judgment. 31 Due to the length of time it took to obtain Plaintiff’s expert evaluation, it has become 32 necessary to get an extension of time up to November 30, 2016, to respond to Defendants’ 33 motion for summary judgment. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY CASE NO.: 2:12-cv-02570-TLN-KJN 1 1 The parties agree that the time for Plaintiff to file his opposition to Defendants’ motion 2 for summary judgment should be extended to November 30, 2016. The parties agree that 3 Defendants’ reply shall be due within forty-five (45) days after filing of Plaintiff’s opposition 4 to the motions for summary judgment. 5 The parties stipulate that an extension of time up to November 30, 2016, for Plaintiff to 6 file his oppositions to the motions for summary judgment will not significantly impact the 7 progress of this case or prejudice the Defendants. This request is not brought for any improper 8 purpose. 9 Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record –Rebecca E. Ihejirika; and Defendants - 10 Dr. Athannasious, Dr. Weiland and Dr. Bick by and through their attorney - Deputy Attorney 11 General – Kevin W. Reager, together with Defendant – Dr. Khaira by and through his attorney 12 – Theodore D. Poppinga, hereby stipulate that the Court grant the said parties an extension of 13 the deadline by which Plaintiff shall file his oppositions to the motions for summary judgment 14 and the Defendants’ shall file their reply. 15 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record –Rebecca E. Ihejirika, and 16 Defendants - Dr. Athannasious, Dr. Weiland and Dr. Bick by and through their attorney - 17 Deputy Attorney General – Kevin W. Reager, together with Defendant – Dr. Khaira by and 18 through his attorney – Theodore D. Poppinga hereby request as follows: 19 (1) The deadline for Plaintiff to file his Oppositions to the Motions for Summary Judgment 20 is extended up to and including, November 30, 2016. 21 (2) The Defendants’ reply shall be due within forty-five (45) days after filing of Plaintiff’s 22 Oppositions to the Motions for Summary Judgment. 23 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 24 25 26 27 28 29 Date: 10/27/2016 Sign: _/s/ Rebecca E. Ihejirika___________________ REBECCA E. IHEJIRIKA Attorney for Plaintiff Milton Sykes Date: 10/27/2016 Sign: _/s/ Kevin W. Reager______________________ KEVIN W. REAGER Attorney for Defendants – Dr. Athannasious, Dr. Weiland, Dr. Bick 30 31 32 33 34 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY CASE NO.: 2:12-cv-02570-TLN-KJN 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Date: 10/27/2016 Sign: _/s/ Theodore D. Poppinga_________________ THEODORE D. POPPINGA Attorney for Defendant – Dr. Khaira Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1.) Plaintiff Milton Sykes shall file his Oppositions to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment on or before November 30, 2016. 2.) Defendants’ Reply shall be due within forty-five (45) days after filing of Plaintiff’s Oppositions to the Motions for Summary Judgment. 11 12 Dated: October 31, 2016 13 14 15 16 17 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY CASE NO.: 2:12-cv-02570-TLN-KJN 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?