Bozorgmanesh v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/8/2013 REMANDING CASE pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) because the hearing transcript was not included in the record; DIRECTING the Appeals Council to remand the case for transcription of the hearing and inclusion in the record. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX,
Social Security Administration
4
5
6
7
8
9
ARMAND D. ROTH
Special Assistant United States Attorney
California Bar No. 214624
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8924
Fax: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Armand.Roth@ssa.gov
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SACRAMENTO
15
16
17
Azam Bozorgmanesh,
18
Plaintiff,
19
20
v.
Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security,
21
Defendant.
22
23
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
24
25
/////
26
27
28
1
No. 12-cv-02656-CKD
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR SENTENCE SIX
REMAND
1
2
3
The parties have agreed to a voluntary remand of this case pursuant to sentence six
of 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g) because the hearing transcript was not included in the record.
Upon remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case for transcription of the
4
5
6
hearing and inclusion in the record.
Respectfully submitted on August 7, 2013,
7
/s/ Jesse S. Kaplan
JESSE S. KAPLAN
Attorney for Plaintiff
8
9
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX,
Social Security Administration
By: /s/ Armand Roth
Special Assistant United States Attorney
10
11
12
13
14
15
ORDER
16
17
18
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 8, 2013
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?