Bozorgmanesh v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/8/2013 REMANDING CASE pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) because the hearing transcript was not included in the record; DIRECTING the Appeals Council to remand the case for transcription of the hearing and inclusion in the record. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration 4 5 6 7 8 9 ARMAND D. ROTH Special Assistant United States Attorney California Bar No. 214624 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8924 Fax: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Armand.Roth@ssa.gov 10 11 Attorneys for Defendant 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SACRAMENTO 15 16 17 Azam Bozorgmanesh, 18 Plaintiff, 19 20 v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, 21 Defendant. 22 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 24 25 ///// 26 27 28 1 No. 12-cv-02656-CKD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR SENTENCE SIX REMAND 1 2 3 The parties have agreed to a voluntary remand of this case pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g) because the hearing transcript was not included in the record. Upon remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case for transcription of the 4 5 6 hearing and inclusion in the record. Respectfully submitted on August 7, 2013, 7 /s/ Jesse S. Kaplan JESSE S. KAPLAN Attorney for Plaintiff 8 9 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration By: /s/ Armand Roth Special Assistant United States Attorney 10 11 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 17 18 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 8, 2013 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?