Mosley v. Broyles

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/07/13 ordering that the court finds that plaintiff's appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should not continue on appeal. (cc: USCA,9th circuit) (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DERRICK MOSLEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-2681 CKD P v. ORDER BROYLES, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis, sought relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. Judgment was entered in this action on April 23, 2013. (ECF No. 15.) On July 18, 2013, 19 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit referred this matter to the district court 20 for the limited purpose of determining whether plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should 21 continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith pursuant to 28 22 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). (ECF No. 24.) The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure provide as follows: 23 24 [A] party who has been permitted to proceed in an action in the district court in forma pauperis . . . may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization unless . . . the district court shall certify that the appeal is not taken in good faith or shall find that the party is otherwise not entitled so to proceed . . . . 25 26 27 Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). After review of the record herein, the court finds that plaintiff’s appeal is 28 //// 1 1 frivolous. Accordingly, plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should not continue on appeal. 2 Dated: August 7, 2013 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 /broy2681.4d 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?