Miller v. CitiMortgage Inc., et al.
Filing
21
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/6/2013 RECOMMENDING that defendant Republic be dismissed from this action; Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
HERBERT E. MILLER,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:12-cv-2697 GEB GGH PS
vs.
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., et al.,
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
14
Defendants.
15
/
16
This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
17
On March 15, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to show cause within fourteen days for his failure to
18
serve defendant Republic with summons. At that time, plaintiff was advised that failure to
19
respond to the order would result in a recommendation that this defendant be dismissed. Plaintiff
20
did not respond to the order to show cause. There is no record that defendant Republic Mortgage
21
Home Loans, LLC (“Republic”) has been served with the complaint. (Dkt. no. 1.) Pursuant to
22
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the court may dismiss an action where service of summons
23
is not made within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. This action was filed on September
24
27, 2012 in state court, and plaintiff has not yet served defendant Republic with summons.
25
26
Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that defendant Republic be dismissed from
this action.
1
1
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
2
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within
3
fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may
4
file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be
5
captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge”s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to
6
the objections shall be served and filed within seven (7) days after service of the objections. The
7
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
8
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
9
DATED: June 6, 2013
10
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
GGH:076/Miller2697.fr.4m.wpd
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?