Miller v. CitiMortgage Inc., et al.

Filing 21

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/6/2013 RECOMMENDING that defendant Republic be dismissed from this action; Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HERBERT E. MILLER, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:12-cv-2697 GEB GGH PS vs. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., et al., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 Defendants. 15 / 16 This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 17 On March 15, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to show cause within fourteen days for his failure to 18 serve defendant Republic with summons. At that time, plaintiff was advised that failure to 19 respond to the order would result in a recommendation that this defendant be dismissed. Plaintiff 20 did not respond to the order to show cause. There is no record that defendant Republic Mortgage 21 Home Loans, LLC (“Republic”) has been served with the complaint. (Dkt. no. 1.) Pursuant to 22 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the court may dismiss an action where service of summons 23 is not made within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. This action was filed on September 24 27, 2012 in state court, and plaintiff has not yet served defendant Republic with summons. 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that defendant Republic be dismissed from this action. 1 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 2 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 3 fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may 4 file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be 5 captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge”s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to 6 the objections shall be served and filed within seven (7) days after service of the objections. The 7 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 8 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 DATED: June 6, 2013 10 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 GGH:076/Miller2697.fr.4m.wpd 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?