De Leon et al v. Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc. et al

Filing 45

ORDER AFTER HEARING signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/18/2014 ORDERING that the 36 Motion for Sanctions and Protective Order is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 JESUS DE LEON, JOSE DE JESUS URZUA, RUBEN GALLO, RUBEN GALLO JR., JUAN MANUEL GALLO, CRECENSIOSANCHEZ, ALEJANDRO ROMOMORALES, JOSE ROBERTO SANTOS CASTRO, VICENTE SANTOS CASTRO, RICARDO TRUJILLO, LUIS GALLO, and MELKISEDEC BARRERA, on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, 19 20 21 22 ORDER AFTER HEARING Plaintiffs, 17 18 No. 2:12-cv-2740-TLN-EFB v. BURKETT’S POOL PLASTERING, INC., ROBERT BURKETT, and MATTHEW WINDORSKI, Defendants. On March 12, 2014, the court heard defendant Burkett’s Pool Plastering, Inc.’s motion for 23 a protective order and request for attorney’s fees, which the court construes as a motion for 24 sanctions. ECF No. 36. Attorney Mark Van Brussel appeared on behalf of defendants; attorney 25 Joseph Sutton appeared on behalf of plaintiffs. For the reasons stated on the record, the motion 26 for sanctions is denied and the motion for a protective order is denied. 27 DATED: March 18, 2014. 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?