De Leon et al v. Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc. et al

Filing 72

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/2/2014 DENYING 71 Motion for Reconsideration. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JESUS DE LEON, ET AL.,

12

Plaintiffs,

13
14
15

v.
BURKETT’S POOL PLASTERING, INC.
ET AL.,

No. 2:12-cv-02740-TLN-EFB

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO RECONSIDER

Defendants.

16
17

This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants Burkett’ s Pool Plastering, Inc.,

18
19

Robert Burkett, and Matt Windorski’s (collectively referred to as “Defendants”) Motion to

20

Reconsider Magistrate Judge Brennan’s Ruling (ECF No. 71). Defendants contend that

21

Magistrate Judge Brennan’s ruling in which he amended the scheduling order to accommodate

22

extending the discovery cutoff is clearly erroneous and contrary to law.

23

The Court has considered Defendants’ request and finds that Magistrate Judge Brennan’s

24

ruling is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, as required pursuant to Local Rule 303(f). See

25

also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). In fact, the Court is aware of the tactics that Defendants have

26

employed throughout discovery in an effort to impair Plaintiffs’ discovery requests. Thus,

27

///

28

///
1

1

Defendants are now on notice that such behavior will not be tolerated by this Court. The Court

2

agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s well-reasoned decision and thus DENIES Defendants’ motion

3

for reconsideration (ECF No. 71).

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: December 2, 2014

8
9
10
11

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2