HPROF, LLC v. Taylor

Filing 4

ORDER ADOPTING 3 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and REMANDING CASE to San Joaquin County Superior Court signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/22/13. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HPROF, LLC, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. MICHAEL TAYLOR, 15 ORDER Defendant. 16 / 17 18 No. 2:12-cv-2757 MCE DAD PS Defendant is proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 On November 15, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein (ECF No. 3) which were served on Defendant and which contained notice that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after 22 service of the findings and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and 23 Defendant has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 26 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 15, 2012 (ECF No. 3) are 3 ADOPTED in full; 4 5 6 7 2. This action is summarily REMANDED to the San Joaquin County Superior Court; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Dated: January 22, 2013 8 9 10 ________________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?