Arce v. Valley Prune, LLC et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/2/13: The hearing date for class certification is continued to December 11, 2013, with Plaintiff's motion for class certification and supporting documents to be filed on or before November 6, 2013, with opposition and reply briefs filed in accordance with Local Rule 230. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
NANCY HERSH, State Bar No. 49091 nhersh@hershlaw.com CHARLES C. KELLY, II, State Bar No. 122253 ckelly@hershlaw.com HERSH & HERSH A Professional Corporation 601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2080 San Francisco, CA 94102-6316 (415) 441-5544 JULIA L. MONTGOMERY, State Bar No. 184083 jmontgomery@crlaf.org CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION 2210 K Street, Suite 201 Sacramento, CA 95816 (916) 446-7904 Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION EDGAR ARCE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, CLASS ACTION Case No.: 2:12-cv-02772-JAM-CMK Plaintiff, v. VALLEY PRUNE, LLC; TAYLOR BROTHERS FARMS, INC.; and DOES 1-20, ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RELATED DATES Defendants The Court, having read and considered the Stipulation to Extend Time to File Motion for Class Certification and Related Dates, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS ORDERED THAT: /// [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RELATED DATES 2:12-CV-02772-JAM-CMK The hearing date for class certification is continued to December 11, 2013, with Plaintiff’s motion for class certification and supporting documents to be filed on or before November 6, 2013, with opposition and reply briefs filed in accordance with Local Rule 230. DATED: 7/2/2013 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RELATED DATES 2:12-CV-02772-JAM-CMK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?