Nunez v. Porter, et al

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/9/13 ORDERING that plaintiff shall file and serve his opposition within twenty days after service of this order. Defendants shall file and serve their reply, if any, within seven days thereafter.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS NUNEZ, JR., 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:12-cv-2775 KJN P vs. K.M. PORTER, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff requests a twenty-day extension of time within which to file and serve his 17 opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 21.) Defendants provided plaintiff with 18 notice of the requirements for opposing their motion to dismiss, pursuant to Wyatt v. Terhune, 19 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n.14 (9th Cir. 2003), and Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012). 20 (See Dkt. No. 20.) For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file 21 and serve his opposition within twenty days after service of this order. Defendants shall file and 22 serve their reply, if any, within seven days thereafter. 23 24 SO ORDERED. DATED: May 8, 2013 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 nune2775.eot 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?