Nunez v. Porter, et al
Filing
64
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/9/15 ADOPTING IN FULL 62 Findings and Recommendations. Defendants Till, Norton, and Caraballo's 53 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The claims against these defendanst are DISMISSED without prejudice. D. Till (Sgt.), D. Carabello (Sgt.) and S. Norton (Sgt.) terminated. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CURTIS NUNEZ, JR.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-2775 JAM KJN P
v.
ORDER
K. M. PORTER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On May 14, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 14, 2015, are adopted in full.
3
2. Defendants Till, Norton, and Caraballo’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 53)
4
5
6
is granted.
3. The claims against these defendants are dismissed without prejudice.
DATED: July 9, 2015
7
/s/ John A. Mendez__________________________
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?