McFarland v. Almond Board of California et al

Filing 57

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/20/14 ORDERING that the deadline for the parties to complete Discovery is CONTINUED to 10/13/14, and Expert Discovery to 1/15/15 as agreed upon and requested by the parties.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
5 Galen T. Shimoda (Cal. State Bar No. 226752)  Jennet F. Zapata (Cal. State Bar No. 277063)  Shimoda Law Corp.  9401 East Stockton Boulevard, Suite 200 Elk Grove, CA 95624  Telephone: (916) 525-0716  Facsimile: (916) 760-3733 Email: attorney@shimodalaw.com jzapata@shimodalaw.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSI McFARLAND 7 Howard A. Sagaser (Cal. State Bar No. 72492) Ian B. Wieland (Cal. State Bar No. 285721) Marcia Ann Ross (Cal. State Bar No. 160489) 7550 North Palm Ave., Suite 201 Fresno, CA 93711 Telephone: (559) 421-7000 Facsimile: (559) 473-1483 Email: has@sw2law.com Marcia@sw2law.com ian@sw2law.com 1 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Defendant ALMOND BOARD OF CALIFORNIA Michael Baytosh (SBN 176189) Prout LeVangie 2021 N St Sacramento, CA 95811 Phone: (916) 443-4849 Fax: (916) 443-4855 Email: Michael.baytosh@proutlaw.com Attorney for Defendant TIM BIRMINGHAM 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 SUSI MCFARLAND, 22 23 Plaintiff, vs. 24 25 26 27 28 ALMOND BOARD OF CALIFORNIA; TIM BIRMINGHAM, an individual; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:12-CV-02778-JAM-CKD STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE ALL DISCOVERY STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONT. DISCOVERY DEADLINE Case No. 2:12-CV-02778-JAM-CKD 1 1 2 WHEREAS the court issued a scheduling order (“order”) on or about May 16, 2013 (Doc. 30); 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to the order, the last day for the parties to exchange expert witness 4 information is July 11, 2014 and supplemental disclosures and disclosure of any rebuttal experts 5 under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(c) must be made be made by July 25, 2014; 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS the last day for the parties to complete all discovery is September 12, 2014; WHEREAS not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the close of discovery, the parties must file a “Joint Mid-Litigation Statements” summarizing all law and motion practice heard by the court, along with other information; 10 WHEREAS all dispositive motions shall be filed by October 22, 2014 and hearing on such 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 motions shall be on November 19, 2014 at 9:30 a.m.; WHEREAS the final pre-trial conference is set for January 16, 2015 at 11:00 a.m.; WHEREAS this matter is presently set for trial on February 23, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.; WHEREAS the parties have actively litigated this matter, including propounding and responding to written discovery, have taken depositions and have filed certain discovery motions; WHEREAS the parties attended a private mediation before Judge Cecily Bond at JAMS on June 5, 2014 but did not resolve this matter; 19 WHEREAS the parties wish to take additional depositions; 20 WHEREAS Plaintiff’s counsel will be unavailable during the month of July 2014 and 21 Defendants have been on notice on such notice for a few months; 22 WHEREAS the parties may discuss resolution after the taking of additional depositions; 23 WHEREAS the parties wish to temporarily avoid incurring the expense of engaging in expert 24 25 26 27 28 witness discovery, including depositions; WHEREAS the parties have jointly agreed and stipulated to respectfully request that this Court grant an extension of time for the parties to complete discovery, excluding expert discovery, by October 13, 2014 and that the “Joint Mid-Litigation Statements” be filed fourteen (14) days prior to this new deadline by which to complete discovery, or October 13, 2014; STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONT. DISCOVERY DEADLINE Case No. 2:12-CV-02778-JAM-CKD 2 1 WHEREAS the parties have jointly agreed and stipulated to respectfully request that this 2 Court grant an extension of time for the parties to complete expert discovery until after the filling 3 and ruling on any dispositive motions (Oct. 22nd and Nov. 19, 2014), but before the final pre-trial 4 conference set for January 16, 2015; 5 6 7 8 WHEREAS the parties request the court grant an extension to exchange expert witness information by December 10, 2014 and supplemental disclosures and disclosure of any rebuttal experts under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(c) by January 7, 2015, and all expert witness depositions completed by January 15, 2015; 9 WHEREAS this request is not being made for the purpose of causing delay or for any other 10 improper purpose; 11 WHEREAS continuing the above-referenced deadlines will not prejudice any party or their 12 13 counsel; and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by Plaintiff and 14 15 Defendants, through their respective attorneys of record, that this court continue the deadline for the 16 parties to complete discovery by October 13, 2014, as set forth above, and expert discovery by 17 January 15, 2015, as agreed upon and requested by the parties. 18 19 Date: June 20, 2014 20 By: 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SHIMODA LAW CORP. /s/ Galen T. Shimoda Galen T. Shimoda Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSI McFARLAND // // // // // // // // // // // STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONT. DISCOVERY DEADLINE Case No. 2:12-CV-02778-JAM-CKD 3 1 Date: June 19, 2014 SAGASER, WATKINS & WIELAND PC 2 By: 3 4 5 6 /s/ Howard A. Sagaser Howard A. Sagaser (Approved on 6/19/2014) Marcia A. Ross Ian B. Wieland Attorneys for Defendant ALMOND BOARD OF CALIFORNIA 7 PROUT LEVANGIE 8 9 10 Date: June 19, 2014 11 12 By: /s/ Michael Baytosh Michael Baytosh (Approved on 6/19/2014) Attorney for Defendant TIM BIRMINGHAM 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 17 Dated: 6/20/2014 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ John A. Mendez U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONT. DISCOVERY DEADLINE Case No. 2:12-CV-02778-JAM-CKD 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?