Isip v. Solano County

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER for continuance 9 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/21/2013 resetting the Scheduling Conference date for 5/13/2013 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. The parties shall submit a joint status conference statement no later than 4/29/2013. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Mandy Leigh (SBN 225748) Jay T. Jambeck (SBN 226018) jjambeck@leighlawgroup.com LEIGH LAW GROUP 870 Market Street, Suite 1157 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 399-9155 Facsimile: (415) 795-3733 Attorneys for Plaintiff, ROLANDO ISIP 7 8 9 10 11 12 Kathleen J. Williams (SBN 127021) KWilliams@williamslegal.net WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 1250 Sutterville Road, Suite 290 Sacramento, CA 95822 Telephone: (916) 456-1122 Facsimile: (916) 737-1126 Attorneys for Defendant, SOLANO COUNTY 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 ROLANDO ISIP, 18 Case No. 2:12-cv-02780-WBS-DAD Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF STATUS CONFERENCE 19 vs. Date: Time: 20 SOLANO COUNTY, March 4, 2013 2:00 p.m. 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 The Status Conference currently scheduled for March 4, 2013 shall be continued to a date 26 following the filing of the response of Defendant Solano County. The Parties are commanded to 27 meet and confer immediately upon the filing of the response. The Status Conference shall be 28 1 ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF STATUS CONFERENCE CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02780-WBS-DAD 1 2 3 scheduled for May 13, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. The Parties shall submit a Joint Status Conference Statement no later than April 29, 2013. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: February 21, 2013 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF STATUS CONFERENCE CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02780-WBS-DAD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?