Robinson v. San Joaquin County et al

Filing 131

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/19/17. The Clerk of the Court shall reopen this case and serve the parties with a copy of this Court's Scheduling Order along with this Order; The parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Scheduling Statement in conformity with this Order and the court's Scheduling Order within 30 days of this Order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY W. ROBINSON,

12

No. 2:12-cv-02783 MCE GGH

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, proceeding in this action pro se, initially filed this civil rights action on

18

November 13, 2012. On March 11, 2015 the District Court adopted Findings and

19

Recommendations granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, ECF 125, and

20

judgment was entered against plaintiff on the same day. ECF No. 126. Plaintiff appealed the

21

judgment on March 20, 2015, ECF No. 127. The judgment was affirmed except to the extent that

22

plaintiff was permitted to proceed with a claim based solely on his allegation of a discriminatory

23

2009 performance evaluation, i.e., that the performance evaluation itself was potentially an

24

“adverse action” remediable in and of itself. ECF No. 130.
As a result of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25
26
27

1.

The Clerk of the Court shall reopen this case and serve the parties with a copy of

this Court’s Scheduling Order along with this Order;

28
1

1
2
3
4
5
6

2.

The parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Scheduling Statement in

conformity with this Order and the court’s Scheduling Order within 30 days of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 19, 2017
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2