Robinson v. San Joaquin County et al
Filing
29
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/13/13: Discovery due by 3/27/2014, Motions to compel discovery are to be noticed to be heard by 2/27/2014, Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 1/16/2014, Supp lemental/rebuttal experts due by 2/6/2014, all pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be completed on or before 4/24/2014, Pretrial Conference set for 11/13/2014 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., Jury Trial set for 1/5/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY W. ROBINSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-2783 MCE GGH PS
v.
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
ORDER
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
The parties have filed a joint statement regarding scheduling. Accordingly, the court
17
18
makes the following findings and orders:
19
SERVICE OF PROCESS
All defendants have been served and no further service is permitted except with leave of
20
21
court, good cause having been shown.
22
JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted except with leave of
23
24
court, good cause having been shown.
25
JURISDICTION/VENUE
Jurisdiction is undisputed and is hereby found to be proper, as is venue.
26
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
2
MOTION HEARING SCHEDULES
All law and motion except as to discovery is left open, save and except that it shall be
3
conducted so as to be completed by April 24, 2014. The word “completed” in this context means
4
that all law and motion matters must be heard by the above date. Counsel are cautioned to refer
5
to the local rules regarding the requirements for noticing such motions on the court’s regularly
6
scheduled law and motion calendar. This paragraph does not preclude motions for continuances,
7
temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, and is subject to any special
8
scheduling set forth in the “MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS” paragraph below.
9
The parties should keep in mind that the purpose of law and motion is to narrow and
10
refine the legal issues raised by the case, and to dispose of by pretrial motion those issues that are
11
susceptible to resolution without trial. To accomplish that purpose, the parties need to identify
12
and fully research the issues presented by the case, and then examine those issues in light of the
13
evidence gleaned through discovery. If it appears to counsel after examining the legal issues and
14
facts that an issue can be resolved by pretrial motion, counsel are to file the appropriate motion by
15
the law and motion cutoff set forth supra.
16
ALL PURELY LEGAL ISSUES ARE TO BE RESOLVED BY TIMELY PRETRIAL
17
MOTION. Counsel are reminded that motions in limine are procedural devices designed to
18
address the admissibility of evidence. COUNSEL ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE COURT
19
WILL LOOK WITH DISFAVOR UPON SUBSTANTIVE MOTIONS PRESENTED IN THE
20
GUISE OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE AT THE TIME OF TRIAL.
21
DISCOVERY
22
All discovery is left open, save and except that it shall be so conducted as to be completed
23
by March 27, 2014. The word “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted
24
so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been
25
resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has
26
been complied with. Motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the undersigned’s calendar
27
in accordance with the local rules of this court and so that such motions will be heard not later
28
than February 27, 2014.
2
1
EXPERT DISCLOSURE
2
All counsel (and/or pro se parties) are to designate in writing and file with the court, and
3
serve upon all other parties, the names of all experts that they propose to tender at trial not later
4
than January 16, 2014. Simultaneous designation of any supplemental/rebuttal experts is due no
5
later than February 6, 2014. An expert witness not appearing on said lists will not be permitted to
6
testify unless the party offering the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity of the witness
7
could not have been reasonably anticipated at the time the lists were exchanged; (b) the court and
8
opposing counsel were promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness
9
was promptly proffered for deposition. Failure to provide the information required along with the
10
expert designation may lead to preclusion of the expert’s testimony or other appropriate
11
sanctions.
For the purposes of this scheduling order, experts are defined as “percipient” and
12
13
designated experts. Both types of experts shall be listed. Percipient experts are persons who,
14
because of their expertise, have rendered expert opinions in the normal course of their work
15
duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the case. Another term for their opinions are
16
“historical opinions.” Percipient experts are experts who, unless also designated as retained
17
experts, are limited to testifying to their historical opinions and the reasons for them. That is,
18
they may be asked to testify to their opinions given in the past and the whys and wherefores
19
concerning the development of that opinion. However, they may not be asked to render a current
20
opinion for the purposes of the litigation.
21
Retained experts, who may be percipient experts as well, are specifically designated by a
22
party to be a testifying expert for the purposes of the litigation. The retained Rule 26 expert may
23
express opinions formed for the purposes of the litigation.1 A party designating a retained expert
24
1
25
26
27
28
Retained experts may, or may not, be paid for their services. The critical distinction between
percipient and retained experts is that the retained expert will have gathered information during
the course of the litigation for the purpose of rendering an opinion on a disputed fact in the
litigation. Percipient experts are limited to the information available at the time their historical
opinions were given. For example, a physician whose only contact with the litigation was the
treatment of a party prior to the commencement of litigation, or even after commencement, and
whose only purpose was to treat the party, is a percipient expert. This doctor may have issued an
3
1
2
will be assumed to have acquired the express permission of the witness to be so listed.2
The parties shall comply with the information disclosure provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26
3
(a)(2) (B) for any expert, who is in whole or in part designated as a retained expert. This
4
information is due at the time of designation. Failure to supply the required information may
5
result in the striking of the retained expert. No reports are necessary for purely percipient experts.
6
Retained experts are to be fully prepared to render an informed opinion at the time of designation
7
so that they may fully participate in any deposition taken by the opposing party. Retained experts
8
will not be permitted to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion
9
formed, which should have been reasonably available at the time of designation. The court will
10
closely scrutinize for discovery abuse deposition opinions which differ markedly in nature and/or
11
in bases from those expressed in the mandatory information disclosure.
12
FINAL PRETRIAL STATEMENTS AND CONFERENCE
13
The Final Pretrial Conference is set in courtroom #7 of the Honorable Morrison C.
14
England, Jr. on November 13, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.3 Counsel are cautioned that counsel appearing
15
for Pretrial will in fact try the matter.
16
All parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Pretrial Conference, with no
17
matters remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for oral testimony. Counsel
18
are referred to Local Rules 281 and 282 relating to the contents of and time for filing Pretrial
19
Statements. A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES 281 AND 282 WILL BE
20
GROUNDS FOR SANCTIONS.
21
Notwithstanding the provisions of Local Rule 281, which contemplates the filing of
22
separate Pretrial Statements by plaintiffs and defendants, the parties are to prepare a JOINT
23
24
25
26
27
28
opinion in the medical records, but he is not retained for the purpose of the litigation. However,
that same doctor, if asked by a party to render an opinion for the purpose of litigation, over and
above any historically rendered opinions, is a retained expert. See Goodman v. Staples The
Office Superstore LLC, 644 F.3d 817 (9th Cir. 2011) (holding percipient treating physician who
transforms into expert witness must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), and clarifying when
such transformation takes place).
2
The court is not interested in a designation of non-testifying Rule 26 experts, i.e., non-testifying
consultants.
3
The pretrial and trial dates provided here are the first dates available before Judge England.
4
1
STATEMENT with respect to the undisputed facts and disputed factual issues of the case. See
2
Local Rule 281(b)(3), (4), and (6). The undisputed facts and disputed factual issues are to be set
3
forth in two separate sections. The parties should identify those facts which are relevant to each
4
separate cause of action. In this regard, the parties are to number each individual fact or factual
5
issue. Where the parties are unable to agree as to what factual issues are properly before the court
6
for trial, they should nevertheless list in the section on “DISPUTED FACTUAL ISSUES” all
7
issues asserted by any of the parties and explain by parenthetical the controversy concerning each
8
issue. The parties should keep in mind that, in general, each fact should relate or correspond to an
9
element of the relevant cause of action. The parties should also keep in mind that the purpose of
10
listing the disputed factual issues is to apprise the court and all parties about the precise issues
11
that will be litigated at trial. The court is not interested in a listing of all evidentiary facts
12
underlying the issues that are in dispute.4 The joint statement of undisputed facts and disputed
13
factual issues is to be filed with the court concurrently with the filing of plaintiff’s Pretrial
14
Statement. If the case is tried to a jury, the undisputed facts will be read to the jury.
15
Pursuant to Local Rule 281(b)(10) and (11), the parties are required to provide in their
16
Pretrial Statements a list of witnesses and exhibits that they propose to proffer at trial, no matter
17
for what purpose. These lists shall not be contained in the Pretrial Statement itself, but shall be
18
attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to the Final Pretrial Order. Plaintiff’s
19
exhibits shall be listed numerically; defendant’s exhibits shall be listed alphabetically. The
20
Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the proffering of witnesses and exhibits at trial
21
not listed in the Pretrial Order. Counsel are cautioned that the standard will be strictly applied.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
For example, and simplistically, if the claim to be adjudicated involved a traffic accident, the
disputed factual issues might be: whether defendant negligently drove his vehicle through the
intersection by reason of failing to observe traffic signals; whether such negligence caused the
accident involving plaintiff, whether plaintiff’s actions (being distracted) contributed to the
accident; whether plaintiff suffered injury and damages as a result of the accident [perhaps
breaking out specific injuries and damages]. It would be inappropriate and unhelpful to list
myriad evidentiary facts in dispute – whether the light had turned yellow at the time defendant’s
vehicle approached the intersection, whether defendants’ skid marks were 30 feet long, whether
plaintiff was distracted by use of a cell phone, and so forth. However, with respect to the listing
of undisputed facts, the court will accept agreements as to evidentiary facts.
5
1
On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses which counsel do not intend to call or use
2
will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes.
3
Counsel are also reminded that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, it will be their duty at the
4
Pretrial Conference to aid the court in (a) formulation and simplification of issues and the
5
elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; (b) settling of facts which should be properly
6
admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary proof and cumulative evidence. Counsel must
7
prepare their Pretrial Statements, and participate in good faith at the Pretrial Conference, with
8
these aims in mind. A FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF
9
SANCTIONS which may include monetary sanctions, orders precluding proof, eliminations of
10
claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as the court deems appropriate.
11
TRIAL SETTING
12
Trial is set for January 5, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. #7 before the Honorable
13
Morrison C. England, Jr. Trial will be by jury. The court expects the trial will take
14
approximately seven to ten days.
15
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
16
A Settlement Conference will be set at the time of the Pretrial Conference, or unless
17
sooner requested by both parties.
18
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
19
20
There appear to be no other matters presently pending before the court that will aid the
just and expeditious disposition of this matter.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), THIS COURT SUMMARIZES THE SCHEDULING
23
24
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
1.
The parties may conduct discovery until March 27, 2014. Motions to compel
25
discovery are to be noticed to be heard by February 27, 2014, as more specifically described in
26
this order.
27
28
2.
The parties shall disclose experts, as described herein, by January 16, 2014.
Supplemental/rebuttal experts shall be disclosed simultaneously by February 6, 2014.
6
1
2
3
3.
All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be completed as
described herein on or before April 24, 2014.
4.
Pretrial Conference (as described in Local Rule 282) is set in this case for
4
November 13, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. Pretrial statements shall be filed in accord with Local Rules 281
5
and 282.
6
7
5.
This matter is set for jury trial on January 5, 2015, at 9:00 a.m.
Dated: October 13, 2013
8
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
9
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
GGH:076/Robinson2783.so
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?