Robinson v. San Joaquin County et al

Filing 63

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/4/2014 ORDERING that the 61 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. EEOC's 60 motion for leave of court to file an untimely opposition to plaintiff's motion to compel is GRANTED, and the EEOC's opposition is ACCEPTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on counsel of record for the EEOC at the address indicated in its filing. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ANTHONY W. ROBINSON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:12-cv-2783 MCE GGH PS v. ORDER COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Presently pending before the court is plaintiff’s March 11, 2014 motion to compel non- 16 17 party EEOC’s compliance with subpoenas. (ECF No. 45.) When the EEOC did not file a 18 response to the motion, this court issued an order to show cause for the failure. Although the 19 order was signed on April 2, 2014, it was docketed on April 3, 2014, after the EEOC filed its 20 April 2, 2014 motion for leave of court to file its opposition. The EEOC has sufficiently provided 21 cause for its failure in documentation indicating that it was not timely served with plaintiff’s 22 motion. The EEOC has also filed its opposition.1 (ECF No. 60.) 23 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 24 1. The order to show cause, filed April 3, 2014, is discharged. 25 2. EEOC’s motion for leave of court to file an untimely opposition to plaintiff’s motion to 26 compel is granted, and the EEOC’s opposition is accepted. 27 28 1 A joint statement will not be required for this motion. 1 1 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on counsel of record for the 2 EEOC at the address indicated in its filing. 3 Dated: April 4, 2014 4 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 GGH:076/Robinson2783.osc-dchg 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?