Bank of America NA v. Stansell
Filing
4
ORDER ADOPTING 3 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/15/13. Case REMANDED to Yuba County Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans
Servicing, LP fka Countrywide Home
Loans Servicing, LP,
12
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
vs.
BRENDA STANSELL,
16
17
No. 2:12-cv-2802 GEB GGH PS
Defendant.
ORDER
__________________________________/
18
On November 21, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
19
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the
20
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
21
Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.
22
United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
23
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
24
1983).
25
26
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed
November 21, 2012, are ADOPTED and
3
1. This action is remanded to the Yuba County Superior Court;
4
2. The Clerk is directed to serve a certified copy of this order on the Clerk of the
5
Yuba County Superior Court, and reference the state case number (YCSCCVUD 12-0000331) in
6
the proof of service; and
7
8
3. The Clerk is directed to close this case.
Dated: January 15, 2013
9
10
11
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?