Campos-Riedel v. JP Morgan Chase et al
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/22/2013 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 10/16/2012 complaint is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before 3/15/2013. Defendants' 8 motion to dismiss, having been rendered moot, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SOFIA CAMPOS-RIEDEL,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:12-cv-2819 GEB DAD PS
vs.
JP MORGAN CHASE, et al.,
14
ORDER
Defendants.
15
/
16
This matter came before the court on February 22, 2013, for hearing of defendants
17
JP Morgan Chase and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. No.
18
8.) Julie Corriveau, Esq. appeared telephonically for defendants. Plaintiff Sofia Campos-Riedel
19
appeared on her own behalf.
20
21
Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments on file and at the hearing, and for
the reasons set forth in detail on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
1. Plaintiff’s October 16, 2012 complaint is dismissed with leave to amend;
23
2. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before March 15, 20131; and
24
25
26
1
Plaintiff is cautioned that if she fails to file an amended complaint on or before March
15, 2013, the undersigned will issue findings and recommendation recommending that this action
be dismissed.
1
1
3. Defendants’ December 3, 2012 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 8), having been
2
rendered moot, is denied without prejudice.
3
DATED: February 22, 2013.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.pro se\riedel2819.oah.022213
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?