Griner et al v. National City Mortgage et al

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/30/13 ORDERING that the 2/6/2013 hearing on defendants' 4 motion to dismiss is hereby VACATED, and the matter is submitted on the record and briefs without oral argument. The scheduling conference set for 2/6/2013 also VACATED until the pending motion to dismiss has been resolved. Once the motion has been resolved, the court will reset a scheduling conference in this matter if appropriate. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOY SIMS GRINER, 12 No. 2:12-cv-2822-MCE-CMK Plaintiff, 13 vs. ORDER 14 NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, proceeding in this action in propria persona, brings this civil action. 18 This case is set for an initial scheduling conference on February 6, 2013. Defendants’ motion to 19 dismiss (Doc. 4), currently pending before the court, is also set for hearing on February 6, 2013. 20 No opposition to the pending motion has been filed. 21 Given the failure of plaintiffs to file an opposition, and pursuant to Eastern 22 District of California Local Rule 230(c), the hearing scheduled for February 6, 2013, at 10:00 23 a.m., before the undersigned in Redding, California, is hereby taken off calendar and the matter is 24 submitted on the record and briefs without oral argument. The court also finds it appropriate to 25 vacate the scheduling conference until the pending motion to dismiss has been resolved. Once 26 /// 1 1 the motion has been resolved, the court will reset a scheduling conference in this matter if 2 appropriate. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 DATED: January 30, 2013 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?