Calhoun v. Gomez et al

Filing 123

ORDER denying 120 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 03/28/17. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

JAMONT L. CALHOUN,

11
12
13

No. 2:12-cv-2856 GEB DB P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

M. GOMEZ, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

17

U.S.C. § 1983. He once again requests that the court appoint counsel. (ECF No. 120.) As

18

plaintiff has been previously informed (see ECF Nos. 50; 55; 68; 80), district courts lack authority

19

to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States

20

Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may

21

request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer,

22

935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir.

23

1990). When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must consider the

24

likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro

25

se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970

26

(9th Cir. 2009).

27
28

Having again considered those factors, the court still finds there are no exceptional
circumstances in this case.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the appointment of

2

counsel (ECF No. 120) is denied.

3

Dated: March 28, 2017

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

TIM-DLB:10
DB / ORDERS / ORDERS.PRISONER.CIVIL RIGHTS / calh2856.31

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2