Calhoun v. Gomez et al
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/19/13 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMONT L. CALHOUN,
12
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-2856-GEB-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
M. GOMEZ, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. On August 14, 2013, the court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint and found
19
service appropriate for defendants Green, Gomez, Merriweather and Young. That order gave
20
plaintiff 30 days to submit the documents necessary for service of process on defendants and
21
warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the order could result in dismissal of his case. The
22
time for acting has passed and plaintiff has failed to comply with or otherwise respond to the
23
court’s order.
24
25
Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to
prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110.
26
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
27
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
28
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
1
1
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
2
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections
3
within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.
4
Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
5
Dated: September 19, 2013.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?