Calhoun v. Gomez et al

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/24/13 ADOPTING IN FULL 14 Findings and Recommendations. Claims against defendants Goodrich and Kuppinger are DISMISSED from this action as improperly joined and the claims against defendants Edington and Heintschel are DISMISSED from this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMONT L. CALHOUN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-2856-GEB-EFB P v. ORDER M. GOMEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 14, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 14, 2013, are adopted in full; and 27 28 ///// 1 1 2. Claims against defendants Goodrich and Kuppinger are dismissed from this action as 2 improperly joined and the claims against defendants Edington and Heintschel are dismissed from 3 this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 4 Dated: December 24, 2013 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?