Vong v. Bank of America, N.A.

Filing 24

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/13/2013 ORDERING Vicki St. John, counsel for Plaintiff, to SHOW CAUSE why she should not be sanctioned $300 for her failure to appear and why she should not be required to reimburse defendant for the cost of its attorney's appearance at the hearing. The 8 Motion to Dismiss is SUBMITTED on the papers. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KOSAL VONG, an individual, 10 Plaintiff, NO. CIV. S-12-2860 LKK/DAD 11 v. O R D E R 12 13 14 15 16 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., (for itself and as the successor to COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., d/b/a America's Wholesale Lender, Inc., and as successor to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP); and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 17 Defendants. / 18 19 On May 13, 2013, defendant’s motion to dismiss came on for 20 hearing on the court’s regular Law and Motion Calendar. 21 Plaintiff’s counsel, Vicki St. John, without any notice to the 22 court, failed to appear at the hearing. 23 appeared for the hearing, apparently never having been notified 24 that plaintiff’s counsel would not appear. Defendant’s counsel 25 Accordingly, plaintiff’s counsel is ORDERED to show cause why 26 she should not be sanctioned $300 for her failure to appear, and 1 1 why she should not be required to reimburse defendant for the cost 2 of its attorney’s appearance at the hearing. 3 230(i) (sanctions authorized for failure to appear at hearing on 4 noticed motion). 5 See E.D. Cal. R. The court notes that this is the second OSC to issue against 6 plaintiff’s counsel relating to this dismissal motion. 7 OSC was discharged based upon the detailed representations of 8 plaintiff’s 9 emergencies.” counsel that she was “distracted The first by family 10 The motion to dismiss (ECF No. 8), is SUBMITTED on the papers. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 DATED: May 13, 2013. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?