Vong v. Bank of America, N.A.
Filing
24
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/13/2013 ORDERING Vicki St. John, counsel for Plaintiff, to SHOW CAUSE why she should not be sanctioned $300 for her failure to appear and why she should not be required to reimburse defendant for the cost of its attorney's appearance at the hearing. The 8 Motion to Dismiss is SUBMITTED on the papers. (Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
KOSAL VONG, an individual,
10
Plaintiff,
NO. CIV. S-12-2860 LKK/DAD
11
v.
O R D E R
12
13
14
15
16
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
(for itself and as the
successor to COUNTRYWIDE
HOME LOANS, INC., d/b/a
America's Wholesale Lender,
Inc., and as successor to
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP);
and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,
17
Defendants.
/
18
19
On May 13, 2013, defendant’s motion to dismiss came on for
20
hearing
on
the
court’s
regular
Law
and
Motion
Calendar.
21
Plaintiff’s counsel, Vicki St. John, without any notice to the
22
court, failed to appear at the hearing.
23
appeared for the hearing, apparently never having been notified
24
that plaintiff’s counsel would not appear.
Defendant’s counsel
25
Accordingly, plaintiff’s counsel is ORDERED to show cause why
26
she should not be sanctioned $300 for her failure to appear, and
1
1
why she should not be required to reimburse defendant for the cost
2
of its attorney’s appearance at the hearing.
3
230(i) (sanctions authorized for failure to appear at hearing on
4
noticed motion).
5
See E.D. Cal. R.
The court notes that this is the second OSC to issue against
6
plaintiff’s counsel relating to this dismissal motion.
7
OSC was discharged based upon the detailed representations of
8
plaintiff’s
9
emergencies.”
counsel
that
she
was
“distracted
The first
by
family
10
The motion to dismiss (ECF No. 8), is SUBMITTED on the papers.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
DATED:
May 13, 2013.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?