White v. Smyers et al

Filing 59

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/26/2014 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 are ADOPTED in FULL; and Plaintiff's 39 Motion for immediate Injunctive Relief is DENIED. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WALTER HOWARD WHITE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-2868 MCE AC P v. ORDER D. SMYERS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 28, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein, ECF 20 21 No. 53, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 22 objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. 23 Plaintiff has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, the 24 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 28, 2014, ECF No. 53, are ADOPTED 3 IN FULL; and 4 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for immediate injunctive relief, ECF No. 39, is DENIED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: September 26, 2014 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?