Williams v. Freeze et al

Filing 50

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/3/2014 AFFIRMING the decision of the magistrate judge re 30 Order denying Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDRES WILLIAMS, 12 No. 2:12-cv-2894 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 FREEZE, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 On April 7, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s 18 order filed March 17, 2014, denying plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel. Under E.D. 19 Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or 20 contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that the magistrate judge’s 21 ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 22 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the 23 magistrate judge filed March 17, 2014, is affirmed. 24 DATED: June 3, 2014. 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?