Ivory v. Unknown
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/01/14 granting 37 Motion to Strike plaintiff's reply to the answer. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NORMAN IVORY,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:12-cv-2902 WBS AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
R. MIRANDA, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Defendant Miranda filed an answer to plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim, the remaining
18
claim of the first amended complaint. See ECF Nos. 33, 34. Thereafter, plaintiff filed what he
19
termed a “response” to the answer. ECF No. 36. Defendant Miranda has moved to strike that
20
response. ECF No. 37.
21
Rule 7(a)((7) permits a reply to an answer “if the court orders one …” This court has not
22
ordered a reply to the answer and does not find one to be necessary or appropriate in this instance.
23
Accordingly IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s reply
24
to the answer (ECF No. 37) is granted.
25
DATED: July 1, 2014
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?