E.M.M. v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/18/2012. The 3 Motion to Appoint Consuelo Mercadal as Ad Litem for plaintiff is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 4 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. Clerk directed to serve Magistrate J udge Claire's Scheduling Order and serve copy of Order on U.S. Marshal. Within 15 days from date of Order, plaintiff shall submit to U.S. Marshal a completed Summons, copies of Complaint, and file a Statement with Court that said documents have been submitted. [cc: U.S. Marshal Services] (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
E.M.M.,
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
CIV 2:12-cv-2907 AC (SS)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
15
16
Defendant.
__________________________________/
ORDER
17
Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social
18
Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”)
19
under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Consuelo Mercadal, plaintiff E.M.M.’s mother,
20
requests the court appoint her guardian ad litem to represent the interests of her minor child.
21
Doc. No. 3. Plaintiff, through her mother, requests authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed
22
in forma pauperis. Doc. No. 4.
23
A.
24
Motion to Appoint Guardian Ad Litem
Federal Rule of Civil Procedur17(c)(2) provides that “[a] minor who does not
25
have a duly appointed representative may sue by next of friend or by guardian ad litem.”
26
Further, a “court must appoint a guardian ad litem . . . to protect a minor . . . .” Id. The
1
1
application reveals that it should be granted, and therefore the court appoints Consuelo Mercadal
2
guardian ad litem for plaintiff E.M.M.
3
B.
Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
4
Plaintiff requests permission to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
5
1915. Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by § 1915(a) showing that plaintiff is unable
6
to prepay fees and costs or give security for them. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma
7
pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
8
C.
9
10
11
Conclusion
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The motion to have Consuelo Mercadal appointed guardian ad litem for
plaintiff E.M.M, Doc. No. 3, is granted.
12
2. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. No. 4, is granted.
13
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned’s scheduling order
14
15
16
17
in social security cases.
4. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the
United States Marshal.
5. Within fifteen days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the
18
United States Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement
19
with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal.
20
6. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment
21
of costs not later than sixty days from the date of this order. Service of process shall be
22
completed by delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to the United States Attorney for
23
the Eastern District of California, and by sending a copy of the summons and complaint by
24
registered or certified mail to the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, D.C. See
25
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(A) & (B). The Marshal shall also send a copy of the summons and
26
complaint by registered or certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security, c/o Office of
2
1
General Counsel, Region IX, 160 Spear Street, Suite 800, San Francisco, CA 94105-1545. See
2
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(2).
3
DATED: December 18, 2012.
4
5
6
`
ALLISON CLAIRE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?