Clear Connection Corporation v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC

Filing 110

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/19/17 ORDERING that Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC's Request to seal document re its Motions for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CLEAR CONNECTION CORPORATION, a
California Corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company; and DOES 1 through 30,
inclusive,
Defendants.
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company,
Counterclaimant,
vs.
CLEAR CONNECTION CORPORATION, a
California corporation, CLEAR CONNECTION,
LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, and
KURK MOODY, an individual,
Counterdefendants.

Case No. 2:12-cv-02910-TLN-DB
ORDER RE COMCAST CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT,
LLC’S REQUEST TO SEAL
DOCUMENTS RE ITS MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Having read and considered Defendant Comcast Cable Communications Management,
LLC’s (“Comcast”) Request to Seal Documents Re Its Motions for Summary Judgment, the
Court finds compelling reasons to grant the Request.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Comcast’s Request to Seal Documents Re Its Motions
for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the following documents shall be filed under seal:
With respect to Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC’s Notice of Motion
and Motion for Summary Judgment:
1. Portions of Comcast’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Its
Motion for Summary Judgment referencing information that has been designated “Confidential”
under the Stipulated Protective Order.
2. Portions of Comcast’s Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Its Motion for
Summary Judgment referencing information that has been designated “Confidential” or “Highly
Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the Stipulated Protective Order.
3. Exhibits 15, 17-20, 24-27, 30, and 33-38 to the Affidavit of Brian C. Rocca In
Support of Comcast’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
With respect to Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC’s Notice of Its
Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims:
4. Portions of Comcast’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Its
Motion for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims referencing information that has been
designated “Confidential” under the Stipulated Protective Order.
5. Portions of Comcast’s Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Its Motion for
Summary Judgment on Counterclaims referencing information that has been designated
“Confidential” under the Stipulated Protective Order.
6. Exhibits 7-8, 10-12, 14-16, and 20 to the Affidavit of Daryl S. Landy in Support of
Comcast’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims.
7. Portions of the Affidavit of Meghan Bishop in Support of Comcast’s Motion for
Summary Judgment on Counterclaims referencing information that has been designated

28
1

1
2
3
4
5
6

“Confidential” under the Stipulated Protective Order.
8. Exhibits A and B to the Affidavit of Meghan Bishop in Support of Comcast’s
Motion for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims.
9. Portions of the [Proposed] Order Granting Counterclaimant Comcast’s Motion for
Summary Judgment on Counterclaims referencing information that has been designated
“Confidential” under the Stipulated Protective Order.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

Dated: January 19, 2017

11
12

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2