Clear Connection Corporation v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC

Filing 147

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/6/2017 GRANTING 139 REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENT(S). (Jackson, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CLEAR CONNECTION CORPORATION, a
California Corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company; and DOES 1 through 30,
inclusive,
Defendants.
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company,
Counterclaimant,
vs.
CLEAR CONNECTION CORPORATION, a
California corporation, CLEAR CONNECTION,
LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, and
KURK MOODY, an individual,
Counterdefendants.

No. 2:12-cv-02910-TLN-DB
ORDER RE COMCAST CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT,
LLC’S REQUEST TO SEAL
DOCUMENTS RE ITS REPLIES
IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1
2
3

Having read and considered Defendant Comcast Cable Communications Management,
LLC’s (“Comcast”) Request to Seal Documents Re Its Motions for Summary Judgment, the
Court finds compelling reasons to grant the Request.

4
5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Comcast’s Request to Seal Documents Re Its Motions
for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the following documents shall be filed under seal:

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

1. Portions of Comcast’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment
referencing information that has been designated “Confidential” under the Stipulated Protective
Order.
2. Portions of Comcast’s Reply to Clear Connection Corporation’s Response to
Comcast’s Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment
referencing information that has been designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential –
Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the Stipulated Protective Order.
3. Portions of Comcast’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment on
Counterclaims referencing information that has been designated “Confidential” under the
Stipulated Protective Order.
4. Portions of Comcast’s Reply to Clear Connection Corporation’s Response to
Comcast’s Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment on
Counterclaims referencing information that has been designated “Confidential” under the
Stipulated Protective Order.
5. Exhibit 26 to the Affidavit of Brian C. Rocca in Support of Comcast’s Reply in
Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment.

22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 6, 2017

25
26

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

27
28
1