Clear Connection Corporation v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC

Filing 147

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/6/2017 GRANTING 139 REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENT(S). (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CLEAR CONNECTION CORPORATION, a California Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 30, inclusive, Defendants. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Counterclaimant, vs. CLEAR CONNECTION CORPORATION, a California corporation, CLEAR CONNECTION, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, and KURK MOODY, an individual, Counterdefendants. No. 2:12-cv-02910-TLN-DB ORDER RE COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS RE ITS REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 2 3 Having read and considered Defendant Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC’s (“Comcast”) Request to Seal Documents Re Its Motions for Summary Judgment, the Court finds compelling reasons to grant the Request. 4 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Comcast’s Request to Seal Documents Re Its Motions for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the following documents shall be filed under seal: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 1. Portions of Comcast’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment referencing information that has been designated “Confidential” under the Stipulated Protective Order. 2. Portions of Comcast’s Reply to Clear Connection Corporation’s Response to Comcast’s Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment referencing information that has been designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the Stipulated Protective Order. 3. Portions of Comcast’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims referencing information that has been designated “Confidential” under the Stipulated Protective Order. 4. Portions of Comcast’s Reply to Clear Connection Corporation’s Response to Comcast’s Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims referencing information that has been designated “Confidential” under the Stipulated Protective Order. 5. Exhibit 26 to the Affidavit of Brian C. Rocca in Support of Comcast’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment. 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 6, 2017 25 26 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?